What better way to give you a sense of the conversations that fill the pages of this book than a series of Facebook statuses? It'd be impractical to summarize all 23 of this book's chapters, so I've picked chapters 1, 3, 6, 11, and 21 to share in status form—with, of course, some creative license. For the record, all posts below are my interpretation, not the original authors' words.
Like • Comment • Share • about an hour ago
Oh yeah? Like what?
29 minutes ago • Like
Email. Paper and pen. Stone tablet.
22 minutes ago • Like
You sure spend a lot of time on Facebook for someone who hates it so much.
19 minutes ago • Like
I keep hearing people say that kids these days don't care about privacy. What do you all think?
Like • Comment • Share • 2 hours ago
Privacy on Facebook is an oxymoron. People post way too many personal details.
2 hours ago • Like
Ever since I lost my job with the Philadelphia Eagles for complaining about a trade, I've really been careful about what I put on Facebook. I never friend anyone from work anymore.
2 hours ago • Like
No, see, that just proves my point, Dan. People only care about privacy when they learn their lesson the hard way.
2 hours ago • Like
I'm not so sure. Don't you remember all the people who protested when News Feed first started posting changes in relationship status and so on? People were very worried about privacy then. I think privacy is contextual. Facebook is a social context—of course people are going to share photos and personal details. Part of being friends with people is sharing things about yourself.
about an hour ago • Like
Yeah, but that social context lures people into thinking that it's a safe place to, say, complain about a company trade. When it feels like a party, you can forget that your boss is lurking in the room.
about an ago • Like
You know, I think you're right about that. By looking like a normal offline social context, Facebook recruits you into helping violate your friends' privacy, and vice versa.
46 minutes ago • Like
Exactly. It's a privacy virus.
32 minutes ago • Like
I was all excited about joining Facebook networks, but then I discovered something weird: Even though I have two degrees from UCLA, I can't sign up for the UCLA Facebook network because I don't have a UCLA.edu email address anymore.
Like • Comment • Share • 4 hours ago
Just as I predicted. Electric media are bringing back earlier forms of tribalism. But what media does Facebook enhance? Retrieve? Reverse into? Obsolesce?
4 hours ago • Like
Well, it definitely improves the directory. That's what "face book" used to mean, and that's what Facebook does really well. It's also like a public bulletin board—people post messages and images for the community. In status messages and wall posts, it can become more like a diary or yearbook.
4 hours ago • Like
Even though Facebook makes finding old friends easier (hi, Ian), I wonder if it makes us less likely to meet up with them in real life. Who needs a reunion when we already know who had kids and who's working for Microsoft and who got fat?
4 hours ago • Like
Yeah, it's like a 24/7 high school cafeteria right in the privacy of your home. But maybe it's also like some hang-out places of the past: the boulevard, the soda shop, the arcade.
3 hours ago • Like
It's a soda shop where everything is happening now. When I added my relationship status to my profile, it said, "Joi is now engaged" —even though I had been engaged for a long time. My friends all started congratulating me. Facebook collapses time, makes the past obsolete.
3 hours ago • Like
Why is Facebook the exception to the rule that people lose their inhibitions online?
Like • Comment • Share • 3 hours ago
People become disinhibited online for a bunch of reasons: the feeling of anonymity and invisibility, erasure of nonverbal cues due to asynchronicity, solipsism, dissociation, and flattening of hierarchy. Facebook doesn't do all those things.
3 hours ago • Like
True. Actually, I don't think Facebook does any of those things. It's tough to be anonymous or invisible on Facebook. Because News Feed updates all the time, it's not as asynchronous as other forms of communication. You usually know all the people you're communicating with in real life, so it's hard to pretend that they're just figments of your imagination. And anyone who's had a boss or a parent join Facebook knows it doesn't flatten hierarchies...
3 hours ago • Like
That's exactly why Facebook is full of fake, inauthentic communication. People's real thoughts are inhibited.
2 hours ago • Like
Skeptic, I disagree. I think it forces us to reconcile the various incarnations of our identity, which means maybe it's more authentic than any other communication. On Facebook, I must be the same person with all my friends as I would be with any one of them.
2 hours ago • Like
Reading Aristotle, I'm struck by how true his description of friendship still seems. Two thousand years later, and we all still agree: friendship is good.
Like • Comment • Share • 6 hours ago
Hang on a minute. Not so fast. Think through this with me: Imagine that the palace of Fenelon, the archbishop of Cambrai, is in flames.
6 hours ago • Like
Sure. I imagine that all the time.
6 hours ago • Like
The fire is going to kill both the archbishop and his valet. If you only have time to save one of them, who should you choose?
6 hours ago • Like
Clearly the archbishop. His death would be a great loss to the community.
6 hours ago • Like
Now imagine that the valet is your brother, or your father, or a friend. Does that change your mind?
6 hours ago • Like
It shouldn't. Impartiality is the most important quality of utilitarian morality.
6 hours ago • Like
Yes, but it only really matters for people who are in the privileged position to be public benefactors.
6 hours ago • Like
What? Only someone laughably cold and calculating would pause long enough to deliberate in that situation. It's one thought too many. Utilitarianism is alienating. Of course I'd save my friend.
6 hours ago • Like
Friendship is necessarily morally suspect. But we can make it better by using friendship as a form of teamwork, banding together to fight for the moral good.
5 hours ago • Like
Maybe this is all moot. I don't know if a Facebook friendship is even really a friendship at all. It's a friendship that makes no demands of us.
5 hours ago • Like
Does Facebook give us political power?
Like • Comment • Share • 8 hours ago
I think it would be better to say that by participating in Facebook, we give it power. We make it profitable for advertisers.
8 hours ago • Like
True, some people even do volunteer labor for us, translating Google sites for free. People have free time. Why shouldn't we take advantage of it?
8 hours ago • Like
Uh, that's creepy, Eric.
8 hours ago • Like
Definitely creepy. And in the meantime, we generate tons of data that Facebook can sell to advertisers. We are the brand. We're used and using each other.
8 hours ago • Like
I think the answer to your original question, Trebor, is "no."
8 hours ago • Like
Maybe. But there are some ways we can fight back, like Jack Toolin's "My Space for Your Life" project. I think we can cause some trouble in the playground/factory of Facebook.
8 hours ago • Like
Facebook Skeptic
Better way? I can think of a few.
35 minutes ago • Like