references:

Aarseth, Espen J. (1994). Nonlinearity and literary theory. In George P. Landow (Ed.), Hyper/text/theory (pp. 51-86). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
 
Arola, Kristin L. (2010). The design of Web 2.0: The rise of the template, the fall of design. Computers and Composition, 27, 4-14.
 
De Certeau, Michel. (1980). The practice of everyday life (Steven Rendall, Trans.). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
 
Dobrin, Sidney I., & Weisser, Christian R. (2002). Breaking ground in ecocomposition: Exploring relationships between discourse and environment. College English, 64(5), 566-589.
 
Johnson-Eilola, Johndan, & Kimme Hea, Amy C. (2003). After hypertext: Other ideas. Computers and Composition, 20, 415-425.
 
Maguire, Patricia. (2006). Uneven ground: Feminisms and action research. In Peter Reason & Hillary Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 60-70). London, UK: SAGE.
 
Manovich, Lev. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
 
Massey, Doreen. (2005). For space. London: SAGE.
 
Nichols, Bill. (1994). The ethnographer's tale. In Lucien Taylor (Ed.), Visualizing theory: Selected essays from VAR 1990-1994 (pp. 60-83). New York: Routledge.
 
Olson, Gary A. (1999). Toward a post-process composition: Abandoning the rhetoric of assertion. In Thomas Kent (Ed.), Post-process theory: Beyond the writing-process paradigm (pp. 7-15). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Pratt, Mary L. (1991). Arts of the contact zone. Profession, 91, 33-40.
 
Reynolds, Nedra. (2004). Geographies of writing: Inhabiting places and encountering difference. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
 
Soja, Edward. (1996). Third space: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
 
Zencey, Eric. (1996). The rootless professors. In William Vitek & Wes Jackson (Eds.), Rooted in the land: Essays on community and place (pp. 15-19). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.