In this essay Joyce distinguishes two modes of thought: structural and
serial. The object of structural thought is discovery, while serial
thought is used to produce. Joyce claims that most exploratory hypertexts
and technical communication projects rely on structural modes of thought,
and therefore are subject to the "myth of emerging order" (190).
-
"For the reader of a technical communication... there is some
nethermost node, a gleaming target that represents the meaning of a
text... This theoretical terminal node can be systematically described by
both its location and its links... [T]he node is thought to be present
and reachable. I.e., every reading by every reader is thought to be
anticipated by the system of exploratory text" (190).
If anyone wants to add to this system, the document questions both their
authorization and the place to put the added information. We distinguish
the appropriateness of this addition by matching what we feel is the
official order of the document with the perceived order of the one making
the addition. If the addition is made, it is a "terminal node; the text
may be seen as leading to it. Yet the addition it perpetually marginal.
Interaction does not reorder the text but conserves authority" (191).
Joyce claims that narratives operate differently. "...[T]he meaning of
narrative is not in the space but, rather, exists for the space of its
unfolding" (192). Meaning is somehow both prior to and outside of the
narrative, therefore knowledge is built as it unfolds. Additions to the
narrative are not a privelege, but actually required and expected by the
story itself. In this narrative situation every reading requires a
reordering of the text and becomes part of the meaning.
This chapter intrigues me because of my interest in technical
communication and my inquiries into what we are about as we teach,
create, organize and arrange it. If technical communication does rely on
Joyce's myth of emerging order, and I understand how it does, then that
seems extremely limiting. Where is the subversion of narrative in the
technical communication process? One place I can think of are newsgroups
that organize themselves around technological subjects. The stories are
told on these newsgroups. With every post the text is reordered and the
knowledge base involving that technology is altered in just the way Joyce
points out. This is only one of the ways we deal with the marginalization
we feel through interacting with the authority of technical
communication. This essay makes me wonder why technical communication
relies on this myth of emerging order? And whether narrative can be
successfully moved inside the technical communication process to reorder
the entire system?